Exploring Yahoo’s “No Work From Home” Plan There is a huge bally
Exploring Yahoo’s “No Work From Home” Plan There is a huge bally hoo bordering the new “no work from home” plan, recently instituted by Marissa Mayer, CEO and
honcho over at Yahoo Kingw88
Ever since, I’ve been following this tale, attempting to determine in my own mind how I feel about it. Work in your home is certainly valuable to workers, so the real question on the table is whether it benefits the company too?
The plan is actors as aloof, draconian, and also anti-woman, but I think it’s none of these points. Whenever the “work in your home” plan occurs, it’s important to return to the question over – WHO benefits one of the most.
If the answer is the workers, after that you have your answer. The company must be run for the benefit of the company, and NOT for the benefit of the workers. It is that simple. It’s Mayer’s purview to decide simply what IS in the benefit of the company – and she has decided that “work in your home” doesn’t satisfy this criteria.
Yes, a business should attempt to satisfy the workers fifty percent way. Free coffee, group building exercises, also drifting vacations are all popular manner ins which companies use to improve worker morale – but also these are not entitlements. If they start to adversely affect the company’s ability to progress AS a business, after that workers can purchase their coffee at Starbucks – can they not?
I’ve listened to grievances that it affects the work/life balance, that versatility is required to maintain workers happy. We should keep in mind that workers exist to WORK first, and to more than happy second. If among these needs to go – after that certainly it must be the last, or there will BE no company, which will not make any body happy.
When it comes to versatility, I make sure that Mayer is no tyrant. I have helped technological companies as a designer myself – and I can inform you that when you gotta be out – after that you gotta be out. No one is mosting likely to stomp on you.
Also if we consider the TYPE of worker, absolutely nothing changes. If the worker gets on income (excluded) after that “work in your home” may be considered a best – but it’s not. The company has rather much less control over your time – but they still control WHERE you invest it when you ARE on the clock.
An per hour worker (non-exempt) can demand overtime for any additional hrs required of them by the company, but here too – WHERE you work when on the clock – is the right of the company to decide.
So there you have it – the “work in your home” question essentially.
This article will not put the issue to rest – but hopefully it will include a brand-new point of view to the issue. Helping a business is simply that – WORK. No one has a best to anything not protected in their contract – and you will not find the right to work from the place of your choice protected there – I think I can promise you.